Advantages of Distributed Processing for Sovereignty
Distributed processing is often treated as a way to add capacity after a central platform has been chosen. For public-sector and sovereign programmes, that order is backwards. This article argues that leaders should map data ownership, jurisdiction, runtime location, and movement before approving an architecture. It examines in-situ execution, observability, egress, and the cases where centralization remains appropriate. The intended reader is accountable for mission systems that must remain auditable across institutional and geographic boundaries.
